panerai 112 lug to lug | Panerai luminor carbotech panerai 112 lug to lug I am trying to find information on the lug-to-lug distance for both PAM 1392 and PAM 1312. Can't figure out which size I want and I wasn't able to stop by an AD. Here are the specs I have so far: $44.00
0 · pam 1392 lug to lug
1 · Panerai pam 1392 lug to lug
2 · Panerai luminor marina review
3 · Panerai luminor carbotech
4 · Panerai luminor 1661 review
5 · Panerai lug to lug dimensions
6 · Panerai 44mm lug to lug
$15.95
pam 1392 lug to lug
The correct lug to lug for the 1392 is 51mm and NOT 48mm.It's extremely difficult to find a reliable source for Panerai lug to lug dimensions. I used to ow. It's extremely difficult to find a reliable source for Panerai lug to lug dimensions. I used to own a 44mm PAM 233 but found the lug to lug too large. I am trying to find information on the lug-to-lug distance for both PAM 1392 and PAM 1312. Can't figure out which size I want and I wasn't able to stop by an AD. Here are the specs I have so far:
It's extremely difficult to find a reliable source for Panerai lug to lug dimensions. I used to own a 44mm PAM 233 but found the lug to lug too large. I was wondering if a 45mm Radiomir might actually be smaller lug to lug? Do the Luminor and 1950 44mm cases have a different lug to lug measurements? With 40mm case, the lug to lug is just around 48mm, making it easily sit on my 6” flat wrist. The dial is also very iconic, with a black paint and a small blue second hand. When I had a few Panerai watches in the past, 44mm was still considered big. Perhaps it still is considered big, but I wear it well on my 19cm wrist. Often, it has to do with the shape of the watch and — of course — the lug-to-lug size.
I am trying to find information on the lug-to-lug distance for both PAM 1392 and PAM 1312. Can't figure out which size I want and I wasn't able to stop by an AD. Here are the specs I have so far: Rendered in brushed steel and measuring 42mm wide (without the crown and guard), 14.5mm thick, and 51mm lug to lug, the PAM 682 will fit a wide range of wrists. For reference, it wears not unlike a Seiko SRP777 (which is wider, but also shorter lug to lug, sharing a similar overall footprint). Whenever you’re buying a watch, ignore the dial diameter and instead focus on lug to lug distance to ensure the watches lugs don’t hang over the edges of your wrist and look to big. For example, I have a 7 inch wrist and the maximum lug length I’m willing to wear is 50mm, or the length of a Tudor BB GMT. Here is the 40mm Panerai Luminor on my 6.25-6.5 inch wrists (2 inch flat top). Wears like a beauty. I initially had the Tudor Pelagos LHD, but that felt way too bulky.
While 46mm lug-to-lug would be perfect for me normally, the lugs do not conform a great deal around my rounded wrist. Without an integrated bracelet to hide the “winging out” past the extremities of my wrist, it does not fit me very well – or at least not how I . For anyone who wanted a Panerai but doesn’t want the full effect of 44mm diameter and 53mm lug to lug this is the watch for you. 40mm diameter, 47mm lug to lug, and a manageable 15mm thickness. It’s a military watch and I can confirm it . I am trying to find information on the lug-to-lug distance for both PAM 1392 and PAM 1312. Can't figure out which size I want and I wasn't able to stop by an AD. Here are the specs I have so far:
It's extremely difficult to find a reliable source for Panerai lug to lug dimensions. I used to own a 44mm PAM 233 but found the lug to lug too large. I was wondering if a 45mm Radiomir might actually be smaller lug to lug? Do the Luminor and 1950 44mm cases have a different lug to lug measurements? With 40mm case, the lug to lug is just around 48mm, making it easily sit on my 6” flat wrist. The dial is also very iconic, with a black paint and a small blue second hand.
When I had a few Panerai watches in the past, 44mm was still considered big. Perhaps it still is considered big, but I wear it well on my 19cm wrist. Often, it has to do with the shape of the watch and — of course — the lug-to-lug size.
I am trying to find information on the lug-to-lug distance for both PAM 1392 and PAM 1312. Can't figure out which size I want and I wasn't able to stop by an AD. Here are the specs I have so far:
Rendered in brushed steel and measuring 42mm wide (without the crown and guard), 14.5mm thick, and 51mm lug to lug, the PAM 682 will fit a wide range of wrists. For reference, it wears not unlike a Seiko SRP777 (which is wider, but also shorter lug to lug, sharing a similar overall footprint).
Whenever you’re buying a watch, ignore the dial diameter and instead focus on lug to lug distance to ensure the watches lugs don’t hang over the edges of your wrist and look to big. For example, I have a 7 inch wrist and the maximum lug length I’m willing to wear is 50mm, or the length of a Tudor BB GMT. Here is the 40mm Panerai Luminor on my 6.25-6.5 inch wrists (2 inch flat top). Wears like a beauty. I initially had the Tudor Pelagos LHD, but that felt way too bulky. While 46mm lug-to-lug would be perfect for me normally, the lugs do not conform a great deal around my rounded wrist. Without an integrated bracelet to hide the “winging out” past the extremities of my wrist, it does not fit me very well – or at least not how I .
Panerai pam 1392 lug to lug
butterfly gucci bag
$24.95
panerai 112 lug to lug|Panerai luminor carbotech
